Home Page of Masonry Magazine

Advertise to mason contractors

Subscribe to Masonry Magazine
Sponsors of Masonry Magazine
Classified Advertising for Mason Contractors
Contact Masonry Magazine
Search Masonry Magazine
Order reprints of Masonry Magazine
News for masonry contractors
Calendar of masonry events
Links to masonry related sites
Web site of the Mason Contractors Association of America
Web site of the Mason Contractors Association of America
Sponsored topics:
Mortar & Restoration NEW!
Sponsored topics:
Mortar & Restoration NEW!
Masonry Magazine Readership Survey

Government Affairs

Firebrand founder, Thomas Paine once wrote that "government in its best form is but a necessary evil; in its worst, an intolerable one." I don't think he would have been so generous toward government were he able to see what the federal government he and his fellow founders established has evolved into in setting the modern technical standards by which industry and citizens must live.

Un-elected federal bureaucrats are now circumventing the U.S. Constitution by unilaterally writing and enforcing regulatory laws through a system known as "consensus standards" — an oxymoron in this case.

This year, the House Subcommittee on Workforce Protections heard testimony from industry and union experts on the issue of non-consensus standards, in which regulations carrying the weight of law are written by a single outside group with no oversight, public participation or input from competing organizations — a violation of federal law by the federal government itself.

The Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA) is required by the Occupational, Safety and Health Act (OSH) to conduct rigorous examination taking into account the Data Quality Act, the Regulatory Flexibility Act, a small business impact analysis, stakeholder input and judicial review before finalizing any new health or workplace safety regulation.

However, the career bureaucrats at OSHA devised a clever scheme to overcome this requirement for external review of their rule writing.

What should be consensus standards are now written primarily by the non-governmental American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH). The hearings revealed that OSHA employees are in fact actively participating as members of ACGIH in writing the standards, bypassing all Congressional safeguards.

And the gross errors created by this scheme are magnified by the nation's current regulatory climate. Nearly half of all states have adopted their own safety and health programs in lieu of federal OSHA standards. These states must provide safety and health protection equal to or greater than what is required by OSHA. As a result, many states indirectly rely upon non-consensus standards to match or exceed OSHA regulations.

Our fight in Congress against these folks that Paine clearly would have listed as "tyrants," right alongside the agents of Great Britain, is on hold for now. It is politically next to impossible to push through regulatory reform in an election year, so the conclusion of this fight must wait until 2007.

There are three routes to victory. The first is we can win voluntary return to true consensus standards through firm executive action from the administration. The second route is we can push through new laws guaranteeing that all future standards will be true consensus standards. Or, third, we can ask the courts to force OSHA to comply with the law.

The year 2007 promises a fight against a regulatory bureaucracy that Thomas Paine would be glad to call "intolerable."







  •  
     

    www.masonrymagazine.com

    MASONRY
    ©2006 by the Mason Contractors Association of America
    All rights reserved
    33 South Roselle Road, Schaumburg, IL 60193
    Phone: 847-301-0001 or 800-536-2225 | Fax: 847-301-1110

    Web site by: Lionheart Publishing, Inc.
    506 Roswell Street, Suite 220, Marietta, GA 30060
    Phone: 770-431-0867 | Fax: 770-432-6969
    lpi@lionhrtpub.com
    www.lionhrtpub.com