New OSHA Clarifications Impact The Masonry Industry

Words: Jeff Buczkiewicz

OSHA has had numerous recent rulings and interpretations that have been good for our industry.  Just yesterday, they announced further clarification on a COVID interpretation that was released earlier this year.  In the earlier interpretation, they stated that if you wrote down temperatures of employees while screening for the day that you needed to keep them for 30 years. In addition, they also stated that any screening paperwork asking about COVID symptoms would also need to be kept for 30 years.  The MCAA, through our coalition (Construction Industry Safety Coalition), asked for OSHA to reconsider and to further clarify their ruling (click here to read the letter). 

 

As a result of the request, OSHA further clarified that unless the temperatures or work was being done by a physician, nurse, or other healthcare personnel, that the records did not need to kept for 30 years.  This was a nice win for the CISC on the interpretation.  We were arguing against the need to comply with the Access to Employees Exposure and Medical Records Standard that they cited as the reason for the original interpretation. 

 

In a separate issue, the MCAA filed again with members of the CISC as an interested party (Amicus Brief) to a court case brought by the AFL CIO to force OSHA to draft an ETS (an emergency standard for dealing with COVID 19) to deal with the impact of COVID on employees.  The CISC argued that there was enough guidance and industry cooperation on directives from CDC, and OSHA that a rule was not needed.  The courts agreed with OSHA and the CISC and rejected the request from the AFL CIO.  The AFL CIO has filed for a rehearing on the ETS. We will see were this ends up over the next few weeks. 

 

In yet another issue, this one related to Beryllium and the rule that included construction into a beryllium rule, the MCAA and some CISC partners had sued OSHA over the process and lack there of process for the inclusion of construction in the beryllium rule.  We have been working to settle the case, and movement has been made to help settle the case.  We are still early in the process on settlement, but things are looking positive at the time.  Look for further details on this as they develop. 

The Craft of Brick Repair: The Difference Between a Coverup and a Solution
June 2026

More often than not, you can walk up to a wall, observe its condition, and get an entire timeline story. How it was built, how footers were set, and where water is routed. After years in the field, I’ve come to understand that brick repair isn’t maintenan

The Benefits of Concealed Lintel Systems in Modern Masonry
June 2026

When looking at iconic structures built throughout history, one of the most recognizable architectural elements is the masonry arch. These arches are not only aesthetically and visually pleasing but also serve as an engineering solution for structural sta

What’s New With CMU: A Closer Look From Ken Rathbun
June 2026

Anyone who’s spending time around CMU jobs today can see the shift. Concrete masonry isn’t just the backup wall; it is the finish on more projects. Thanks in part to the CMU check-off program and a broader focus on design and education, architects and own

Brick & Masonry Aesthetics: Managing Color, Consistency, and Architectural Expectations
June 2026

Brick and masonry remain among the most admired architectural materials in the world because of their natural beauty and authenticity. Masonry possesses depth, variation, texture, permanence, and character that synthetic cladding systems often struggle to