New OSHA Clarifications Impact The Masonry Industry

Words: Jeff Buczkiewicz

OSHA has had numerous recent rulings and interpretations that have been good for our industry.  Just yesterday, they announced further clarification on a COVID interpretation that was released earlier this year.  In the earlier interpretation, they stated that if you wrote down temperatures of employees while screening for the day that you needed to keep them for 30 years. In addition, they also stated that any screening paperwork asking about COVID symptoms would also need to be kept for 30 years.  The MCAA, through our coalition (Construction Industry Safety Coalition), asked for OSHA to reconsider and to further clarify their ruling (click here to read the letter). 

 

As a result of the request, OSHA further clarified that unless the temperatures or work was being done by a physician, nurse, or other healthcare personnel, that the records did not need to kept for 30 years.  This was a nice win for the CISC on the interpretation.  We were arguing against the need to comply with the Access to Employees Exposure and Medical Records Standard that they cited as the reason for the original interpretation. 

 

In a separate issue, the MCAA filed again with members of the CISC as an interested party (Amicus Brief) to a court case brought by the AFL CIO to force OSHA to draft an ETS (an emergency standard for dealing with COVID 19) to deal with the impact of COVID on employees.  The CISC argued that there was enough guidance and industry cooperation on directives from CDC, and OSHA that a rule was not needed.  The courts agreed with OSHA and the CISC and rejected the request from the AFL CIO.  The AFL CIO has filed for a rehearing on the ETS. We will see were this ends up over the next few weeks. 

 

In yet another issue, this one related to Beryllium and the rule that included construction into a beryllium rule, the MCAA and some CISC partners had sued OSHA over the process and lack there of process for the inclusion of construction in the beryllium rule.  We have been working to settle the case, and movement has been made to help settle the case.  We are still early in the process on settlement, but things are looking positive at the time.  Look for further details on this as they develop. 

Holding History Together: The Art of Lateral Restraint in Masonry Restoration
January 2026

The first thing you notice about an old masonry building isn’t always its beauty. Sometimes it’s the bow in a wall or the way time and the elements have tugged at the mortar joints. Every century-old structure carries its story in cracks, tilts, bows, and

Stone Savvy: Helping Clients Choose Stone with Intent
January 2026

In today’s design environment, clients are surrounded by inspiration, endless images, samples, and styles that make choosing materials feel exciting and overwhelming all at once. Within that sea of options, stone carries weight. It defines first impressio

MASONRY STRONG Podcast, Episode 36 Recap: Kim Spahn, CEO of the Concrete Masonry Checkoff
January 2026

On this episode of the MASONRY STRONG Podcast, Justin got to sit down for a conversation with Kim Spahn to talk about the Concrete Masonry Checkoff, how Kim first got involved in this industry, and much more.

From Day One to Long-Term Success: Onboarding Strategies for Contractors
January 2026

The construction industry is facing one of its toughest challenges in decades. Companies are struggling to find enough skilled workers while competing to keep the ones they have. At the same time, projects are becoming more complex, deadlines are tighter,